Claude Lévi-Strauss vs Carl Gustav Jung
"Le savant n'est pas l'homme qui fournit
les vraies réponses;
c'est celui qui pose les vraies questions"
(Claude Levi Strauss, Le cru et le cui. Ouverture I
| Aquesta cita ens recorda l'enyorat
analista Adolf Guggenbühl-Craig quan al Congrés de Zürich ens deia: "quan
afornteu les questions obertes en Psicologia Analítica, i presenteu
respostes, deixeu-les obertes a noves preguntes" Per tant permeteu-nos aquest repte. Formular diverses preguntes... Sovint a Claude Lévi-Strauss i a Jung se'ls compara i contraposa... Es Lévi-Strauss més semiňleg que simbňlic? Tracten de la mateixa manera els mites? Podem pensar que entre les seves diferčncies es troba que a l'un el pot la nostalgia mentre que l'altre es pregunta per la teleologia? Els uneix la importŕncia de la cerca de sentit? En els dos es veu la mitologia com un factor estructural de la psique humana? Tenen en els dos la mateixa importŕncia els mites i els aspectes de la cultura? En quins aspectes es pot pensar que ambdós presenten un excés reductiu de psicologització? |
This quotation reminds us analyst Adolf
Guggenbühl-Craig when at the Congress of Zurich told us: "When
facing the open questions in Analytical Psychology, and present
answers, leave them open to new questions" So let us this challenge. Formulate several questione ... Often Claude Lévi-Strauss and Jung are compared and contrasted ... Levi-Strauss is more semiologist than symbolic? Do they treat the same way the myths? May we think that the differences between them are that in one we found a bit of nostalgia while the other asks for teleology? Are they linked by the importance of the search of meaning? Both of them see mythology as a structural factor of the human psyche? The myths and the cultural aspects are equally important to both of them? In what ways can we think that both have an excess of reductive psychology? |
i més...